Free team report
Diagnose your documentation exposure before a review does.
Answer 12 questions in about 2 minutes. Get an instant score, see where evidence, continuity, and fidelity are exposed, and unlock the full personalised report by email.
About 2 minutes
Short enough to complete between sessions and fast enough to use as a real cold-traffic entry point.
Instant score first
See your score before any email gate so the free win lands immediately.
Full report unlocked by email
Use your email only to unlock named recommendations, system profile, action roadmap, and PDF.
What the report shows
Four diagnostic areas, one quantified priority fix.
Evidence quality
How easily clinical claims can trace back to source-session evidence.
Handover continuity
Whether a new clinician can step in without rebuilding the story manually.
Plan fidelity
Whether the delivered supports still match what was intended for the client.
Incident capture
How clearly risk, escalation, and follow-up signal appear in documentation.
What happens after
Answer 8 scored workflow questions first, then 4 optional personalisation questions.
See your instant score and weakest dimension across the four diagnostic areas.
Unlock the full personalised report by email and take the priority fix into a free trial if it fits.
What it asks
The questions are simple. The signal is not.
The diagnostic is built to surface the operational places where documentation quality quietly breaks down: timeliness, evidence traceability, team continuity, and delivery clarity.
Scored breakdown
See which part of the documentation system is strongest and which needs attention first.
Priority fix
Leave with one concrete improvement rather than a vague list of best practices.
Team-ready language
Use the report to frame an internal quality conversation with more clarity and less noise.
Example questions
Are session notes completed quickly enough to stay clinically useful?
Can the team show which interventions were delivered in each session?
Do progress-report claims trace back to source-session evidence?
Could a new clinician understand the client history without handover guesswork?
Would current notes make risk, escalation, and follow-up visible to a reviewer?
These are not abstract quality questions. They are proxies for whether a clinician, supervisor, or reviewer can trust the record when the stakes are higher, and for what you should fix first.
Risk check FAQ
Questions about the free team report
Direct answers on what the assessment covers, who it is for, and what happens after you finish it.
Still have questions? Email the founders directly